Skip to content
Pamela Y. Price Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Reviews
  • Pamela’s Page
  • Book Pamela!
  • Signature Cases
  • Contact

Bumphus v. Timec

Home/Signature Cases/Bumphus v. Timec
Previous Next

Bumphus v. Timec

On June 18, 1998, after eight days of trial, in Bumphus v. Timec, a federal court jury awarded $905,000, including $500,000 in punitive damages against Timec Corporation to John Bumphus. The jury vindicated Mr. Bumphus’ emotional three-year struggle for justice.

Timec provides maintenance, turnaround, and construction services to oil and gas, industrial, and utility customers in the United States. The company had 11 offices in the U.S., specializes in catalyst handling, outsourced training, safety support, small capital construction, specialized welding, supplemental maintenance, and turnkey turnaround services. Timec worked at 39 of the country’s 150 refineries with clients such as Chevron and Shell. Mr. Bumphus and several of his African-American co-workers testified at trial to a pervasive atmosphere of racial bias at Bay Area refineries staffed by Timec, including the use of racial slurs and derogatory remarks about African-Americans by Timec supervisors, and a long history of race discrimination against African-Americans.

John Bumphus started as a Mechanic A with Timec in the Bay Area in October 1989. Over the next six (6) years, he took supervisory classes and made repeated requests to work overtime. He was never given the opportunity to supervise a crew, and he noticed that the overtime opportunities routinely went to his Caucasian co-workers. On one occasion, when he complained about the use of racial slurs on the job, he was laid off for four (4) months. When he complained about the denial of overtime, nothing changed – he continued to be denied overtime and his supervisor told him that Timec did not like “complainers.” When Mr. Bumphus filed a written complaint about the denial of overtime, he was fired in January 1995.

The Law Offices of Pamela Y. Price represented Mr. Bumphus at trial, presenting evidence of a racially hostile work environment and retaliation against Mr. Bumphus. The jury’s unanimous verdict included $400,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages against Timec. The evidence of race discrimination and retaliation was so compelling that at the beginning of his cross-examination of one long-time African-American employee, Timec’s lawyer apologized to the witness. The jury found that Timec was on notice of the supervisors’ racist attitudes and discriminatory actions, and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it from occurring.

Following the verdict, a joyful Mr. Bumphus proclaimed “Now I can go on with my life!!”

By Pamela|2020-04-28T17:42:36+00:00April 12th, 2016|Signature Cases|Comments Off on Bumphus v. Timec

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditGoogle+TumblrPinterestVkEmail
Pamela Y. Price
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...
Pamela Y. Price
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

Articles

Eradicating Sexual Harassment in Education, MacKinnon & Siegel (Eds.), New Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, Yale Press (2004)

Contributing Editor, California Practice Guide: Employment Litigation, Chapter 10, Harassment, The Rutter Group (2006)

Published Opinions

Freitag v. CDC - 468 F. 3d 528 (9th Cir. 2006), 127 S. Ct. 1918 (2007).

Walker v. County of Contra Costa (N.D.Cal. 2005) 227 F.R.D. 529.

Taylor v. Beth Eden Baptist Church & Gillette O. James (N.D. Cal. 2003) 294 F.Supp.2d 1074

Morgan v. Amtrak, 232 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir. 2000), 536 U.S. 101, S. Ct. 1516 (2002).

Jones v. K-Mart, et al. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 3298.

Nicole M. v. Martinez Unified School District (N.D.Cal. 1997) 964 F.Supp. 1369.

Patricia H. v. Berkeley Unified School District, et al. (N.D.Cal. 1993) 830 F.Supp.1288.

Beneficial Finance, Inc. v. Durkee (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 912.

Wilson v. U.S. Postal Service (1987) 32 M.S.P.R. 244.

Wilson v. MSPB (Fed.Cir. 1986) 807 F.2d 1577.

Pierre C. v. Superior Court (1984) 159 Cal.App.3d 1120.

 
Northern California
 

Get Social

Tweets by PPriceCares
Pamela Price, Democratic Party Central Committee Member

Connect with pamela

Pamela Y. Price, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 5843
Oakland 94605
hope@pypesq.com
Phone: 510-452-0292
Fax: 510-452-5625

10.0Pamela Yvette Price
Pamela Y. Price
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

Let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father in heaven. Matthew 5:16

Copyright © 2017 Pamela Y. Price, Attorney At Law · All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: This website is Attorney Advertising. No prior result in a case guarantees a similar outcome. Each case we handle is individual with different facts and therefore every case is different. The materials on this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this website or any of the pages or links within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Attorney Pamela Price and the user or browser. No attorney-client relationship occurs unless and until you sign an agreement confirming the nature and scope of representation.

Toggle Sliding Bar Area
Thank you for reaching out to Attorney Pamela Price. We are excited about her recent landslide election to the Alameda County Democratic Party Central Committee. We appreciate your interest and look forward to building a relationship with you. Have a great day!

Sign up to stay in touch!

Sign up to get early news about Attorney Pamela Price's activities.

By submitting this form, you are granting: Attorney PAMELA Y. PRICE, 7677 Oakport Drive, Oakland, California, 94621, United States, http://www.pypesq.com permission to email you. You may unsubscribe via the link found at the bottom of every email. (See our Email Privacy Policy for details.) Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.

 
Pamela Y. Price
 
 
Northern California
 
The National Black Lawyers